An Encyclopaedia on Chinese History and Literature

Sishu zhangju jizhu 四書章句集注

Sep 13, 2013 © Ulrich Theobald

Sishu zhangju jizhu 四書章句集注 "Interlinear analysis of and collected commentaries on the Four Books", shortly called Sishu jizhu 四書集注, is a collection of fundamental commentaries on the Four Books (Sishu 四書) compiled by the great Neo-Confucian master Zhu Xi 朱熹 (1130-1200). It is his main written contribution to the spreading and consolidation of Neo-Confucianism. The collection consists of the interlinear analysis of the Four Books, namely Daxue zhangju 大學章句 (with a length of 1 juan), Zhongyong zhangju 中庸章句 (1 juan), Lunyu jizhu 論語集注 (10 juan) and Mengzi jizhu 孟子集注 (14 juan).

Table 1. Parts of Zhu Xi's 朱熹 Sishu zhangju jizhu 四書章句集注
大學章句 一卷 Daxue zhangju (Song) 朱熹 Zhu Xi
中庸章句 一卷 Zhongyong zhangju (Song) 朱熹 Zhu Xi
論語集注 十卷 Lunyu jizhu (Song) 朱熹 Zhu Xi
孟子集注 十四卷 Mengzi jizhu (Song) 朱熹 Zhu Xi

For his commentaries on the Daxue 大學 and Zhongyong 中庸 Zhu Xi divided the text into new chapters, paragraphs and sentences (zhangju 章句), but for the Lunyu 論語 and Mengzi 孟子 he retained the structure that had been created by the brothers Cheng Hao 程顥 (1032-1085) and Cheng Yi 程頤 (1033-1107) and their disciples, and added his "collected commentaries" (jizhu 集注).

Zhu Xi followed the interpretation of the early Neo-Confucians and elevated the Daxue, which was actually only a chapter of the ritual classic Liji 禮記, to the status of a book in its own right that served as a guideline to learning everything about moral principles. He was of the opinion that the core part of the Daxue (what he called jing 經 "classic") was a text written by Confucius himself and explained by his disciple Zengzi 曾子 (505-436 BCE), while what Zhu Xi defined as the "commentary part" (zhuan 傳) was a compilation by Zengzi's disciples. The commentary part quotes from the Classics corpus to illustrate the words of the "Classic", i.e. the text of the Daxue.

While the older commentaries on the Daxue by Zheng Xuan 鄭玄 (127-200) or Kong Yingda 孔穎達 (574-648) interpreted the text as a political handbook to be used by a ruler, Zhu Xi identified it as a guideline to self-cultivation and self-perfection. Operating with an ontological perspective, Zhu Xi saw that the "illustrious virtue" was naturally given to all persons, and had to be laid open and adhered to.

Likewise the Zhongyong was made from a chapter of the Liji to an individual classic. It was interpreted as a writing by Zisi 子思 (personal name Kong Ji 孔伋, c. 481–c. 402 BCE), who instructed his disciples, and in the end also the philosopher Mengzi 孟子 (Meng Ke 孟軻, c. 385–c. 304), about the "standards of the heart" (xin fa 心法).

In the eyes of the Neo-Confucians the Four Books constituted the most important teachings of Confucius and demonstrated how his thoughts were transmitted from one generation of philosophers to the next.

The commentaries of Zhu Xi were written over a period of more than forty years and were finished in 1177 or 1179—according to other sources the two jizhu texts in 1168, the two others in 1189—and printed in 1190. They clearly show a Neo-Confucian method of interpretation, according to which each single word was analysed in detail and brought into the context of the Neo-Confucian world view. The collection immediately spread to all academies in the empire and was often reprinted. The Sishu zhangju jizhu became a standard text for the preparation of the state examinations and was called a "ladder to the Six Classics" (liujing zhi jieti 六經之階梯).

The corpus of the four commentaries is included in the series Siku quanshu 四庫全書 and Sibu beiyao 四部備要, and found entrance into the Xinbian Zhuzi jicheng 新編諸子集成, published in 1983 by the Zhonghua Book Company 中華書局.

Quotation 1. Example from Zhu Xi's Commentary Daxue zhangju 大學章句
(大,舊音泰,今讀如字。) In former times, 大 was read like 泰 [tai]. Today it is read like 大 [da].
【章句】(子程子曰:「大學,孔氏之遺書,而初學入德之門也。」於今可見古人為學次第者,獨賴此篇之存,而論、孟次之。學者必由是而學焉,則庶乎其不差矣。) [Sentence Commentary] The Masters Chengzi (i.e. Cheng Yi and Cheng Hao) said: "The Great Learning is a text left by Master Kong. It is the entrance gate to the efficacious virtue at the beginning of studies." From these words it can be seen that the old relied on the existence of this text to start their studies with, and that the books Lunyu and Mengzi only followed in the second place. Only if students begin their studies with this [book], one can be sure that they will not miss their aims.
【經】大學之道,在明明德,在親民,在止於至善。 [Classic] What the Great Learning teaches, is to illustrate illustrious virtue; to renovate the people; and to rest in the highest excellence.
【章句】(程子曰:「親,當作新。」大學者,大人之學也。明,明之也。明德者,人之所得乎天,而虛靈不昧,以具眾理而應萬事者也。但為氣稟所拘,人欲所蔽,則有時而昏;然其本體之明,則有未嘗息者。 Master Cheng said: "Qin 親 (familiar) must be interpreted as xin 新 (renovate)." The Great Learning is the teaching of the great people. Ming 明 means, to illustrate. "Illustrious virtue" is what people have received from Heaven, and which is empty, spiritual, and not darkened; it is that by which the manifold patterns [of order] are provided and thus are resonated [in] the ten thousand affairs. Yet because it is absorbed by material constellations, and because it is obscured by human desires, there are times when it is darkened. Yet the brightness of its original constitution is something which never abates.
故學者當因其所發而遂明之,以復其初也。 For this reason students should follow what it emanates, and to make it illustrious, so they can go back to its origins.
新者,革其舊之謂也,言既自明其明德,又當推以及人,使之亦有以去其舊染之污也。 "Renovation" is a designation for an improvement of old matters. This means that if someone has by himself illustrated his illustrious virtue, he should push it on that it reaches others, and to give them something at hand to dispose of the impurities of their old defects.
止者,必至於是而不遷之意。至善,則事理當然之極也。 "To rest" means that one must move toward it without leaving it then. The highest excellence is therefore the extreme status of how the patterns [of order] ought to be.
言明明德、新民,皆當至於至善之地而不遷。蓋必其有以盡夫天理之極,而無一毫人欲之私也。 This means that someone illustrating illustrious virtue and renovating others ought to move towards the position of highest excellence and not leave it. Then it might be sure that [this position] has something by which the highest excellence of the Heavenly patterns [of order] is accomplished and there is not the slightest selfishness of human desires.
此三者,大學之綱領也。[...]) These three issues are the main guidelines of the Great Learning.[...]
(右經一章,蓋孔子之言,而曾子述之。凡二百五字。其傳十章,則曾子之意而門人記之也。[...]) The above (lit. right) paragraph is a classical text. The word are those of Confucius, and written down by Master Zeng. The ten commentary paragraphs reflect the interpretation of Master Zeng and were recorded by his disciples.[...]
【傳】康誥曰:「克明德。」 [Master Zeng's Commentary] The "Announcement of the Prince of Kang" says: "[King Wen] was able to illustrate his virtue".
【章句】(康誥,周書。克,能也。) [Zhu Xi's commentary] The "Announcement of the Prince of Kang" is [a chapter] of the Zhoushu [which is a book in the Shangshu 尚書]. Ke 克 means, to be able.
【傳】大甲曰:「顧諟天之明命。」 [Master Zeng's Commentary] The [Shangshu chapter] "[King] Tai Jia" says: "[The former king] kept his eye continually on the bright requirements of Heaven."
【章句】([...]顧,謂常目在之也。諟,猶此也,或曰審也。天之明命,即天之所以與我,而我之所以為德者也。常目在之,則無時不明矣。) [Zhu Xi's commentary] [...] "To observe" (顧) means, to keep a constant eye. 諟 means the same, or "to investigate". The "bright requirements of Heaven" are what Heaven wants to bestow upon me, and by which I display virtuous behaviour. Keeping a constant eye, it will at all times be illustrated.
Chen Guodai 陳國代 (2017). "Zhuzi menren canyu Daxue zhangju zhushu huodong zhi kaocha 朱子門人參與《大學章句》著述活動之考察", Wuyi Xueyuan xuebao 武夷學院學報, 2017 (7).
Chen Lai 陳來 (2007). "Lun Zhu Xi Daxue zhangju de jieshi tedian 論朱熹《大學章句》的解釋特點", Wen-shi-zhe 文史哲, 2007 (3).
Chen Lai 陳來 (2007a). "Zhu Xi Zhongyong zhangju ji qi ruxue sixiang 朱熹《中庸章句》及其儒學思想", Zhongguo wenhua yanjiu 中國文化研究, 2007 (5).
Chen Lin 陳林 (2015). "Zhu Xi Daxue zhangju chengyi zhujie dingben bianxi 朱熹《大学章句》“誠意”注解定本辨析", Kongzi yanjiu 孔子研究, 2015 (3).
Chen Meirong 陳美容 (2013). "Cong Daxue zhangju ge wu zhi zhi kan Zhuzi de zhujing yu jiejing 從《大學章句》“格物致知”看朱子的注經與解經", Hulunbei'er Xueyuan xuebao 呼倫貝爾學院學報, 2013 (10).
Dai Zhaoguo 戴兆國, Geng Fangchao 耿芳朝 (2015). "Cong Daxue zhangju yin zhu kao kan Zhu Xi jingdian jieshixue de tedian 從《大學章句》引注考看朱熹经典解釋學的特點", Dongyue luncong 東岳論叢, 2015 (1).
Fu Xiaofan 傅小凡, Zhou Kehao 周克浩 (2012). "Zhu Xi Zhongyong zhangju de tiandiguan 朱熹《中庸章句》的天道觀", Xinyang Nongye Gaodeng Zhuanke Xuexiao xuebao 信陽農業高等專科學校學報, 2012 (3).
Gardner, Daniel (1983). "Chu Hsi's Reading of the Ta-hsüeh: A Neo-Confucian's Quest for Truth", Journal of Chinese Philosophy, 10/3: 183-204.
Gardner, Daniel (1986). Chu Hsi and the Ta-hsüeh: Neo-Confucian Reflection on the Confucian Canon (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).
Gardner, Daniel (2003). Zhu Xi's Reading of the Analects: Canon, Commentary and the Classical Tradition (New York: Columbia University Press).
Geng Fangchao 耿芳朝, Wang Zhenyu 王振鈺 (2019). "Cong Zhongyong zhangju yin zhu kan Zhu Xi jingdian quanshi de yuanze 從《中庸章句》引注看朱熹經典詮釋的原則", Anhui Shifan Daxue xuebao (Renwen shehui kexue ban) 安徽師範大學學報(人文社會科學版), 2019 (1).
Gentz, Joachim (2007). "Die Architektur des Zhu Xi-Kommentars: Eine Textstudie zum ersten Teil des Daxue", Oriens Extremus, 46: 231-245.
Gu Jian 古鋻 (1997). "Sishu zhangju jizhu 四書章句集注, in Men Kui 門巋, Zhang Yanjin 張燕瑾, ed. Zhonghua guocui da cidian 中華國粹大辭典 (Hong Kong: Guoji wenhua chuban gongsi), 499.
He Shanmeng 何善蒙, Lou Wenjia 樓聞佳 (2016). "Zhongyong de junziguan: Yi Zhongyong zhangju wei jichu 《中庸》的君子觀——以《中庸章句》為基礎", Jimei Daxue xuebao (Zhe-she ban) 集美大學學報(哲社版), 2016 (4).
Hu Zhenning 胡振宇 (1997). "Sizhu zhangju jizhu 四書章句集注", in: Pang Pu 龐檏, ed. Zhongguo ruxue 中國儒學 (Shanghai: Dongfang chuban zhongxin), Vol. 3, 130.
Huang Huaixin 黃懷信 (2011). "Daxue, Zhongyong zhangju xianyi 《大學、中庸章句》獻疑", Zhongguo dianji yu wenhua 中國典籍與文化, 2011 (7).
Jiaoyu da cidian bianzuan weiyuanhui 《教育大辭典》編纂委員會 (1991), "Qianziwen 千字文", in: Jiaoyu da cidian 教育大辭典, Vol. 8, Zhongguo gudai jiaoyu shi 中國古代教育史 (Shanghai: Shanghai jiaoyu chubanshe), Vol. 1, 229.
Jin Chunfeng 金春峰 (2014). "Zhu Xi Mengzi jizhu wuo fanying de zhexue sixiang 朱熹《孟子集注》所反映的哲學思想", Shaanxi Shifan Daxue xuebao (Zhexue shehui kexue ban) 陝西師範大學學報(哲學社會科學版), 2014 (1).
Le Aiguo 樂愛國 (2014). "Cheng shi Zhu Xi xueshu tixi de zui gao jingjie: Yi Daxue zhangju, Zhongyong zhangju wei zhongxin de taolun “誠”是朱熹學術體系的最高境界——以《大學章句》、《中庸章句》為中心的討論", Jiang-Huai luntan 江淮論壇, 2014 (11).
Le Aiguo 樂愛國 (2017). "Zhu Xi Lunyu jizhu zhong de dao lun: Jian lun dao yu li de yitong guanxi 朱熹《論語集注》中的“道”論——兼論“道”與“理”的異同關係", Zhexue dongtai 哲學動態, 2017 (2).
Le Aiguo 樂愛國 (2018). "Zhu Xi Mengzi jizhu jie jin xin zhi xing yu ge wu zhi zhi: Jian lun Mou Zongsan de wujie 朱熹《孟子集注》解“盡心知性”與“格物致知”——兼論牟宗三的誤解", Xinan Minzu Daxue xuebao (Renwen sheke ban) 西南民族大學學報(人文社科版), 2018 (12).
Li Hanlin 李翰琳 (2019). "Cong Mengzi jizhu qianxi Zhu Xi de ruxue sixiang 從《孟子集注》淺析朱熹的儒學思想", Wenhua xuekan 文化學刊, 2019 (1).
Li Xueqin 李學勤, Lü Wenyu 呂文鬰, ed. (1996). Siku da cidian 四庫大辭典 (Changchun: Jilin daxue chubanshe), Vol. 1, 547 (entry Daxue zhangju 大學章句).
Li Zhizhong 李致忠 (2012). "Xuzhou shi Tushuguan faxian Songben Sishu zhangju jizhu 徐州市圖書館發現宋本四書章句集注", Shoucangjia 收藏家, 2012 (9).
Liu Jianli 劉建麗 (1988). "Sishu zhangju jizhu 四書章句集注", in Zhao Jihui 趙吉惠, Guo Hou'an 郭厚安, ed. Zhongguo ruxue cidian 中國儒學辭典 (Shenyang: Liaoning renmin chubanshe), 712.
Luo Xiaoru 羅小如 (2004). "Zhu Xi Lunyu jizhu yu He Yan LUnyu jijie zhi bijiao 朱熹《論語集注》與何晏《論語集解》之比較", Longyan Shizhuan xuebao 龍岩師專學報, 2004 (10).
Tang Minggui 唐明貴 (2006). "Zhu Xi Lunyu jizhu tanyan 朱熹《論語集注》探研", Zhonghua wenhua luntan 中華文化論壇, 2006 (7).
Wang Honghai 王宏海 (2010). "Daxue zhi dao de lixuehua: Yi Zhu Xi Daxue zhangju wei hexin de jiedu 大學之道的理學化——以朱熹《大學章句》為核心的解讀", Gaoxiao jiaoyu guanli 高校教育管理, 2010 (5).
Wang Qi 王琦, Zhu Hanmin 朱漢民 (2018). "Cong zhangju zhi xue dao yili zhi xue: Yi Zhu Xi Daxue zhangju yu Jingyan jiangyi wei li 從章句之學到義理之學——以朱熹《大需章句》與《经筵講義》為例", Xinan Minzu Daxue xuebao (Renwen sheke ban) 西南民族大學學報(人文社科版), 2018 (4).
Wang Xinyu 王新宇 (2015). "Ming de yu qin min: Yi Zhuzi Daxue zhangju wei zhongxin “明德”與“親民”——以朱子《大學章句》為中心", Nanjing Gongcheng Xueyuan xuebao (Shehui kexue ban) 南京工程學院學報(社會科學版), 2015-09.
Xiao Yongming 肖永明, Chen Feng 陳峰 (2016). "Wan-Qing Han-Song jiancai sichao zhong de Lunyu quanshi: Yi Lunyu hou'an dui Lunyu jizhu de xishou yu piping wei li 晚清漢宋兼采思潮中的《論語》詮釋——以《論語後案》對《論語集注》的吸收與批評為例", Beijing Daxue xuebao (Zhexue shehui kexue ban) 北京大學學報(哲學社會科學版), 2016 (5).
Yao Hui 姚徽 (1999). "Lun Zhu Xi Lunyu jizhu de tedian ji gongxian 論朱熹《論語集注》的特點及貢獻", Anhui Jiaoyu Xueyuan xuebao (Zhexue shehui kexue ban) 安徽教育學院學報(哲學社會科學版), 1999 (10).
Zhang Hui 張卉, Cai Fanglu 蔡方鹿 (2014). "Zhu Xu Zhongyong zhangju de xingcheng yu wanshan guocheng kaolüe 朱熹《中庸章句》的形成與完善過程考略", Xinan Minzu Daxue xuebao (Renwen shehui kexue ban) 西南民族大學學報(人文社會科學版), 2014 (8).
Zhu Songmei 朱松美 (2005). "Jingdian quanshi yu tixi jiangou: Zhu Xi Mengzi jizhu de quanshi tese ji qi shidaixing fenxi 景點詮釋與體系建構——朱熹《孟子集注》的詮釋特色及其時代性分析", Kongzi yanjiu 孔子研究, 2005 (7).