ChinaKnowledge.de -
An Encyclopaedia on Chinese History and Literature

Sicunbian 四存編

Sep 23, 2013 © Ulrich Theobald

Sicunbian 四存編 "The four treatises on preservation" is a collection of four different philosophical writings compiled during the early Qing period 清 (1644-1911) by Yan Yuan 顔元 (1635-1704). The collection consists of the books Cunxingbian 存性編 "On the preservation of the character", Cunxuebian 存學編 "On the preservation of the (correct) teachings", Cunzhibian 存治編 "On the preservation of the (correct) government", and Cunrenbian 存人編 "On the preservation of humaneness" that are partially treatises, and partially collections of various documents.

Table 1. The Four Treatises Sicunbian 四存編
存性編 Cunxingbian On the preservation of the character
存學編 Cunxuebian On the preservation of the teachings
存治編 Cunzhibian On the preservation of the government
存人編 Cunrenbian On the preservation of humaneness

Yan Yuan hailed from Boye 博野, Hebei, and became a servant of the Buddhist monk Wu Chiming 吳持明, but also learned how to use bow and arrow. His father had been captured by the Manchus and was brought to their homeland beyond the Great Wall. In 1684, Yan Yuan decided to search his father's remains to bring them back home. Later, he became a teacher at the Zhangnan Academy 漳南書院, where he specialised in teaching the practical art of conduct and so deviated from the traditional teaching methods of the Neo-Confucians who concentrated on the study of writings and "vainly discussed the mind and the character" (kong tan xin xing 空談心性). He wrote a commentary on the discussions of master Zhu Xi 朱熹 (1130-1200), Zhuzi yulei ping朱子語類評, and the "brush notes"-style book (biji 筆記) Xizhai jiyu 習齋記餘.

Cunxingbian 存性編

In his 2-juan-long book Cunxingbian (also called Xizhai cunxing bian 習齋存性編), Yan Yuan discusses the various interpretations of the human character. While Mengzi 孟子 simply said that the human character was good (xing shan 性善), Confucius had suggested that the character of each man was similar to that of others. Still, they differed as a consequence of their education and environment (xing xiang jin, xi xiang yuan 性相近,習相遠). The Neo-Confucians of the Song period 宋 (960-1279) had explained Confucius' proposition with the assumption that the human character was generally an inherited part of the universally "good" Heavenly principle (tianli 天理), while the dissimilarity was the consequence of the "substance" or matter of the body (qizhi 氣質). All evilness could, therefore, be led back to a bad disposition caused by the physical existence of the body.

Yet Yan Yuan argued that all matter was part of the universal principle and, therefore, universally good, regardless of its "purity" or "density". He compared the human character with eyesight, the quality of which is a consequence of the substance of the eye and its parts and not caused by moral goodness or badness in the eye. The character of each individual could be compared to gold which is gold in any case, regardless of its size or weight. This means that all humans have the potential to become a sage like the ancient rulers Yao 堯 and Shun 舜. These theories are illustrated in the latter part of the Cunxingbian.

Cunxuebian 存學編

In his book Cunxuebian 存學編, Yan Yuan explains the difference between the vain theories of the Neo-Confucians and the original meaning of the teachings of the Duke of Zhou 周公 and Confucius. While the former were more theoreticians of learning (xue 學), Yan Yuan said that Confucius had always preferred practice (xing 行) to become accustomed (xi 習) to the meaning of his teachings. This book is also to be found in the collection of Yan's "remnant books" Yan Xizhai yishu 顏習齋遺書. It consists of various miscellaneous texts in which Yan Yuan explains his exegesis of the concept of learning in Confucianism as a matter of practical experience (shen shi 身實). These texts include, for instance, the essays Zonglun zhuru jiangxue 總論諸儒講學 "General discussion of the lectures and teachings of all Confucians", Xuebian 學辨 "Discourse on learning", Xingli ping 性理評 "Critique on the character and the Heavenly order", or his letter to Lu Shiyi 陸世儀 (1611-1672), Shang Taicang Lu Futing xiangsheng shu 上太倉陸桴亭先生書.

Cunzhibian 存治編

The Cunzhibian 存治編 was originally called Wangdaolun 王道論 "On the Way of a King". It describes the ideal state as it was believed to have existed during antiquity, with the so-called well-field system (jingtian 井田), the system of regional rulers, and the ancient school system of private teachers. Yan Yuan wrote this text to express his discontent with the contemporary circumstances, especially the acquisition of huge estates by the local elites (see gentry). In his political concepts, Yan Yuan adheres to the traditional methods of opening new fields (kenhuang 墾荒) in hilly regions, the equal-field system (juntian 均田) and the duty of the state or the local communities to engage in river conservancy works.

Cunrenbian 存人編

The 4-juan-long Cunrenbian 存人編 is divided into two parts, of which the first is also called Huanmitu 喚迷途 "Calling at the wrong path". It criticises the "evil beliefs" (xiejiao 邪教) of Buddhism and Daoism for their tendency to deceive the ordinary people with misbeliefs. The third juan is a critique of a praise poem of Emperor Taizu 明太祖 (r. 1368-1398) of the Ming dynasty 明 (1368-1644) for Buddhism, and the last part deals with some persons who openly attacked Buddhist institutions.

The Sicunbian are to be found in the series Jifu congshu 畿輔叢書 and Congshu jicheng chubian 叢書集成初編, as well as in the Yan-Li congshu 顏李叢書 (including writings of Yan Yuan and Li Gong 李塨) and the collected writings Yan Yuan ji 顔元集. In 1957, the Shanghai Guji Press 上海古籍出版社 published a modern edition annotated by Wang Xingxian 王星賢.

Sources:
Ai Ping 艾平. 1997. "Sicunbian 四存編." In Zhongguo ruxue 中國儒學, edited by Pang Pu 龐樸, vol. 3, 207. Shanghai: Dongfang chuban zhongxin.
Chen Jian 陳堅. 2006. "Cunren yu yuanren: Yan Yuan Cunrenbian yu Zong Mi Huayan yuanren lun zhong de renxue sixiang bijiao yanjiu “存人”與“原人”——顏元《存人編》與宗密《華嚴原人論》中的“人學”思想比較研究." Kongzi yanjiu 孔子研究 2006 (5): 67-81.
Chen Shifang 陳世放, and Huang Chuwen 黃楚文. 2005. "Yan Yuan Cunxingbian renxing sixiang yanjiu 顏元《存性編》人性思想研究." Huanan Shifan Daxue xuebao (Shehui kexue ban) 華南師範大學學報(社會科學版) 2005 (4): 37-43+158.
Guo Jian 郭建. 1992. "Sicunbian 四存編." In Zhongguo xueshu mingzhu tiyao 中國學術名著提要, vol. Zhengzhi falü 政治法律卷, edited by Zhou Gucheng 周谷城, 430. Shanghai: Fudan daxue chubanshe.
Jia Chongji 賈崇吉, and Yang Zhiwu 楊致武. 1992. Zhonghua lunli daode cidian 中華倫理道德辭典, 114. Xi’an: Shaanxi renmin chubanshe.
Jiaoyu da cidian bianzuan weiyuanhui 教育大辭典編纂委員會, ed. 1991. Jiaoyu da cidian 教育大辭典, part 8, Zhongguo gudai jiaoyu shi 中國古代教育史, vol. 1, 329. Shanghai: Shanghai jiaoyu chubanshe.
Li Xueqin 李學勤, and Lü Wenyu 呂文郁, eds. 1996. Siku da cidian 四庫大辭典, vol. 2, 1592. Changchun: Jilin daxue chubanshe.
Liu Hong 劉虹,and Shi Huanxia 石煥霞. 2004. "Cong Sicunbian kan Yan Xizhai de shixue jiaoyu sixiang 從《四存編》看顏習齋的實學教育思想." Hebei Shifan Daxue xuebao (Jiaoyu kexue ban) 河北師範大學學報(教育科學版) 2004 (6): 30-34.
Lü Xiaoyan 呂小燕. 1993. "Sicunbian 四存編." In Shijie baike zhuzuo cidian 世界百科著作辭典, edited by Ru Xin 汝信, 110. Beijing: Zhongguo gongren chubanshe.
Shanghai tushuguan 上海圖書館, ed. 1982. Zhongguo congshu zonglu 中國叢書綜錄, vol 1, 702. Shanghai: Shanghai guji chubanshe.
Qian Xianmin 錢憲民. 1992. "Sicunbian 四存編." In Zhongguo xueshu mingzhu tiyao 中國學術名著提要, vol. Zhexue 哲學卷, edited by Zhou Gucheng 周谷城, 796. Shanghai: Fudan daxue chubanshe.
Wang Zi 王孜. 2015. "Qianxi Yan Yuan Cunxingbian de renxing lilun 淺析顏元《存性編》的人性理論." Xue lunli 學理論 2015 (12): 23-24.
Wu Feng 吳楓, ed. 1987. Jianming Zhongguo guji cidian 簡明中國古籍辭典, 236. Changchun: Jilin wenshi chubanshe.
Yan Min 閆敏, and Lu Xianwen 魯先文. 2015. "Xizhai sicun bian dui ruxue de chuancheng lunxi 《習齋四存編》對儒學的傳承論析." Huainan Shifan Xueyuan xuebao 淮南師範學院學報 17 (6): 4-7.
Zhao Zongzheng 趙宗正. 1986. "Sicunbian 四存編." In Zhongguo da baike quanshu 中國大百科全書, part Zhexue 哲學, vol. 2, 840. Beijing and Shanghai: Zhongguo da baike quanshu chubanshe.